Laboral - Rol N° T-126-2023

Tribunal acoge demanda subsidiaria por despido indebido al considerar la carta de despido imprecisa, y condena a indemnizaciones, rechazando tutela y bono MIP por falta de pruebas.

• Plaintiff Nombre, employed as Head of Maintenance by SERMOB LTDA from April 2, 2012, to December 7, 2022, was dismissed for alleged grave breach of contract obligations (Art. 160 N°7, Labor Code).
• Plaintiff claimed dismissal was unjust, undue, and improper, violating his fundamental right to honor, due to a vague dismissal letter and a post-dismissal company meeting.
• The court found the dismissal letter lacked the required precision regarding the specific facts constituting the grave breach of obligations under Art. 160 N°7 CT, failing to detail personal responsibility or company prejudice.
• Consequently, the court upheld the plaintiff's claim for unjustified dismissal (despido indebido).
• The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for a Tutela de Derechos Fundamentales acti...