Penal - Rol N° O-704-2019
C/
Abstracto
This document summarizes a legal case involving GUISSEPPE GIORDANNO CLAVERO ORTIZ. The case was heard at the Juzgado de Garantía de Puente Alto, with RUC 1900061852-K and RIT 704-2019, on January 16, 2019, under a simplified procedure. The facts, accredited on January 15, 2019, at Supermercado Líder, located at Avenida Nonato Coo N° 3108, Puente Alto, state that GUISSEPPE GIORDANNO CLAVERO ORTIZ appropriated various products valued at $22,270 with intent to profit and without payment, being apprehended by security personnel. The legal qualification was a misdemeanor under Article 494 bis of the Penal Code, in a frustrated development stage. The imposed penalty was a pecuniary sanction of one-third of a Monthly Tax Unit (UTM), with the defendant exempted from paying court costs. The defendant was granted a conditional suspension of the pecuniary penalty for 6 months under Article 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Relevant background information on the defendant included his full name, GUISSEPPE GIORDANNO CLAVERO ORTIZ, and RUT 19.126.930-6. No age or occupation was specified, nor was prior criminal record information provided. The court considered mitigating factors such as irreproachable prior conduct (Article 11 N°6 of the Penal Code) and admission of responsibility (Article 11 N°9 of the Penal Code) in determining the penalty and granting the conditional suspension. The summary does not explicitly mention the arguments of the prosecution and defense, basing the sentence on the defendant's admission of responsibility and the presence of mitigating factors. Key foundations for the tribunal's decision included the defendant's admission of responsibility, the existence of mitigating factors, and the application of Article 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Determinative legal provisions cited include various articles of the Penal Code (1, 11 N°6, 11 N°9, 14 N°1, 15 N°1, 18, 21, 31, 49, 69, 70, 432, and 494 bis) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (Articles 388 et seq. and 393 bis). The condition for the suspension was not to be required or formalized for a new offense during the 6-month period, with the consequence of non-compliance being the definitive dismissal of the process. The parties waived their rights to appeal, rendering the sentence final.
Resumen
• Datos básicos del caso: * Tribunal: Juzgado de Garantía de Puente Alto. * RUC: 1900061852-K. * RIT: 704-2019. * Fecha de la audiencia: 16 de enero de 2019. * Tipo de procedimiento: Simplificado.
• Hechos acreditados: * Fecha: 15 de enero de 2019. * Lugar: Supermercado Líder, ubicado en . * Conducta: se apropió de diversos productos, avaluados en $22.270, con ánimo de lucro y sin pagar su valor, siendo sorprendido por personal de seguridad.
• Calificación jurídica y pena impuesta: * Calificación: Falta del artículo 494 bis del Código Penal, en grado de desarrollo frustrado. * Pena: Sanción pecuniaria de un tercio de Unidad Tributaria Mensual (UTM). * Se exime al imputado del p...
Desbloquea el contenido completo gratis
Regístrate ahora para acceder a todas las respuestas y características completas de nuestro asistente legal.
Investigación Jurídica con IA
Ahorra cientos de horas al mes con la nueva plataforma para encontrar y analizar jurisprudencia instantáneamente con inteligencia artificial.