Penal - Rol N° O-8568-2018
C/
Abstracto
This abstract summarizes a legal case involving PATRICK OCTAVIO IBAÑEZ PINCHEIRA versus GABRIEL ERASMO RECABAL ZAMBRANO.
The case was heard in the Juzgado de Garantía de Chillán with RUC 1700702337-5 and RIT 8568-2018. The hearing took place on December 29, 2021, under a simplified procedure.
The facts established are that on May 29, 2017, at approximately 12:35 PM, GABRIEL ERASMO RECABAL ZAMBRANO was driving a Mazda 3, beige, year 2004, PPU xu-3557. Crucially, the defendant was under a 5-year driving suspension, imposed on May 23, 2016, which was still in effect at the time of the incident. The incident occurred at Calle El Roble N° 51, Chillán.
Legally, the defendant was charged with driving a vehicle while under a suspended license, as per Article 209 of the Ley de Tránsito. The imposed penalty was 61 days of imprisonment (grado mínimo), a fine equivalent to two-thirds of a Unidad Tributaria Mensual (UTM), and a suspension of public office during the sentence term. The fine was considered satisfied by the two days of pre-trial detention (May 22 and 23, 2020).
As for benefits or accessory measures, the prison sentence was substituted with partial nighttime house arrest, requiring the defendant to remain at his residence between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM.
Relevant details about the defendant include his name, GABRIEL ERASMO RECABAL ZAMBRANO, his identity card number, 0013859705-9, and his address at Sepúlveda Bustos N° 465, Chillán.
No mitigating or aggravating circumstances were considered. The summary does not detail the arguments of the prosecution or the defense, nor the court's specific reasoning.
The legal provisions cited include articles from the Código Penal (1, 5, 15, 25, 30, 50, 67, 69, 70), Código Procesal Penal (39 and following), Ley N° 18.216 (modified by Ley N° 20.603, articles 8 and following), and Ley N° 18.290 (Ley de Tránsito, Article 209).
Conditions for the sentence substitution include reporting to the Centro de Reinserción Social de Chillán within five days of the sentence becoming final, where a telematic monitoring device will be installed if technically feasible. If not, Carabineros will supervise compliance at the defendant's residence. The summary does not specify consequences for non-compliance.
No information regarding appeals is provided in the abstract.
Resumen
• Datos básicos del caso: * Tribunal: Juzgado de Garantía de Chillán. * RUC: 1700702337-5. * RIT: 8568-2018. * Fecha de la audiencia: 29 de diciembre de 2021. * Tipo de procedimiento: Simplificado.
• Hechos acreditados: * El 29 de mayo de 2017, aproximadamente a las 12:35 horas, conducía un vehículo Mazda, modelo 3, color beige, año 2004, PPU xu-3557. * El imputado fue condenado el 23 de mayo de 2016 a una suspensión de 5 años para conducir, sanción que se encontraba vigente al momento de los hechos. * Lugar de los hechos: calle El Roble N° 51, Chillán.
• Calificación jurídica y pena impuesta: * Delito: Conducción de vehículo durante vigencia de sanción impuesta, según el artículo 20...
Desbloquea el contenido completo gratis
Regístrate ahora para acceder a todas las respuestas y características completas de nuestro asistente legal.
Investigación Jurídica con IA
Ahorra cientos de horas al mes con la nueva plataforma para encontrar y analizar jurisprudencia instantáneamente con inteligencia artificial.