Suprema - Rol N° 2671-2013

Supreme Court Ruling on Mining Concession Nullity and Cassation Appeals

Abstracto

The Supreme Court declared inadmissible the formal cassation appeal and rejected the substantive cassation appeal, upholding the lower court's decision that found a mining concession null due to overlapping prior concessions and procedural defects in the appeal.

Resumen

  • The Supreme Court reviewed appeals for formal and substantive cassation against a lower court's decision concerning a mining concession.
  • The lawsuit originally sought the nullity of the 'Oriente 611' mining exploration concession.
  • The plaintiff, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A., claimed the 'Oriente 611' concession granted to Sociedad Contractual Minera Copiapó was null.
  • The primary ground for nullity alleged was the superimposition of 'Oriente 611' upon the plaintiff's prior concession, 'Llano 567'.
  • This overlap was argued to violate Article 95, numeral 8, of the Mining Code, which allows for nullity when a concession covers land already included in a concession with an earlier pedimento.
  • The plaintiff asserted current legitimate interest to bring the nullity action as ...

Desbloquea el contenido completo gratis

Regístrate ahora para acceder a todas las respuestas y características completas de nuestro asistente legal.

Iniciar Sesión
Ingresa tu correo electrónico abajo para iniciar sesión en tu cuenta
O continuar con

Investigación Jurídica con IA

Ahorra cientos de horas al mes con la nueva plataforma para encontrar y analizar jurisprudencia instantáneamente con inteligencia artificial.

Prueba ahora