Penal - Rol O-216-2024

This document details a simplified criminal procedure case against Salvador Ian Orellana Martínez and Bryan Alexis Opazo Terán.

Case Summary:

• Court: Fifth Guarantee Court of Santiago.
• Date: November 7, 2024.
• Procedure Type: Simplified Procedure.

Proven Facts:

• On January 19, 2024, around 8:50 AM, defendants Nombre and Nombre, along with an unidentified third party, forced entry into a residence at Dirección.
• They entered the bedrooms of victims Nombre (with her minor child) and the elderly couple Nombre and Nombre, restraining, threatening, and assaulting them to steal belongings.
• Stolen items included watches, clothing, bags, perfumes, jewelry, electronics (TVs, cell phones, notebooks), and cash.
• The defendants fled in a stolen Hyundai Tucson (PPU ZE-7377) but were later apprehended.

Legal Classification and Sentence:

• Nombre and Nombre: Convicted of:
  • Robbery with violence and intimidation (Article 436, Penal Code): Eight years of major presidency in its minimum degree, with perpetual absolute accessory disqualifications.
  • Receipt of a motor vehicle (Article 456 bis A, Penal Code): 541 days (for Apellido) / 800 days (for Apellido) of minor presidency in its medium degree, a monthly tax unit fine, and accessory disqualification from public office during the sentence.

Relevant Defendant Information:

• Nombre:
  • Date of Birth: September 6, 2000.
  • Address: Dirección, Cerro Navia.
• Nombre:
  • Date of Birth: February 29, 1996.
  • Address: Dirección, Pudahuel.

Mitigating/Aggravating Factors:

• Mitigating: Acceptance of facts and simplified procedure (Article 11 No. 9, Penal Code) for both.
• Aggravating: Specific recidivism (Article 12 No. 16, Penal Code) and age of victims (Article 12 No. 22, Penal Code) for both.

Key Arguments:

• Prosecution: Requested the described sentences, emphasizing aggravating factors.
• Defense: Accepted facts, requested mitigation (Article 11 No. 9). Defense for Nombre sought a reduced sentence for robbery and recognition of preventive detention time. Defense for Nombre did not contest the sentence request and sought recognition of preventive detention time.

Court's Rationale:

• Facts were established based on evidence.
• Mitigating and aggravating factors were considered and balanced.
• Severity, victim age, incident dynamics, and crime gravity influenced the sentence.
• Sentences must be served effectively, with no alternative penalties.

Key Legal Provisions:

• Penal Code: Articles 1, 7, 11(9), 12(16, 22), 14(1), 15(1), 28, 30, 31, 68, 436, 456 bis A.
• Code of Criminal Procedure: Articles 406 onwards, 468.
• Law 19.970.

Sentencing Conditions:

• No alternative penalties applied; sentences are to be served effectively.

Appeals:

• No information on appeals filed is mentioned.

• Datos básicos del caso: * Tribunal: Quinto Juzgado de Garantía de Santiago. * Fecha: 7 de noviembre de 2024. * Tipo de procedimiento: Procedimiento abreviado.

• Hechos acreditados: * El 19 de enero de 2024, a las 8:50 horas aproximadamente, los imputados Nombre y Nombre, junto con una tercera persona no identificada, forzaron la puerta de un domicilio en Dirección. * Ingresaron a los dormitorios de las víctimas, Nombre, que se encontraba con su hijo menor de edad, y de los adultos mayores Nombre y Nombre. Los maniataron, los amenazaron y golpearon para sustraerles especies. * Sustrajeron un reloj Casio, poleras, un bolso Jordán, perfumes, un anillo de oro, una tarjeta bancaria, desodorantes, televisores (Daewoo, Samsung), ropa, celulares (Samsung, Huawei, Honor, Redmi, Iphone), notebooks (Samsung, Dell, HP), relojes (Armani, Festina, digital), un monedero y dinero en efectivo (153.050 pesos). * Los imputados huyeron del domicilio, siendo detenidos posteriormente. * Utilizaron un vehículo Hyundai Tucson, año 2005, PPU ZE-7377, el cual tenía encargo por robo.

• Calificación jurídica y pena impuesta: * Nombre y Nombre: Condenad...